Breach of Confidence:

Question:I’m in Ontario and think someone misused my business recipe or confidential process; do I have a breach of confidence claim?

Answer:You may have a breach of confidence claim in Ontario if the information has the necessary quality of confidence, was communicated in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence, and was misused without authorization to your detriment, as set out in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd. Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574.   Paralegals at Byfield Legal Services can help you assess what qualifies as confidential business information, gather evidence of how it was shared and used, and identify practical next steps to reduce harm, including demand letters and related claims.   Call (289) 927-7365 for an initial review of your situation in Ontario.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources

Misused Business Secrets

In business, the product recipes, proprietary software, systems and processes, among many other things, may be highly valuable and the misuse of such confidential information may result in considerable harm.  Generally, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

Note: Please contact Byfield Legal Services by phone at: (289) 927-7365 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

The Law

Per the Supreme Court in the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, the elements requiring proof so to constitute a breach of confidence case are:

• The information conveyed was confidential;
• The information was communicated in confidence; and
• The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.